<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automatic Face Fixer</title>
	<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/</link>
	<description>My own personal soapbox</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: r3dw0rm</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-36</link>
		<author>r3dw0rm</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Did someone say free sex?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone say free sex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-22</link>
		<author>brandie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>See Rob.  My site doesn't have porn, but it does have underage girls.  Twice, even, if you count the post about "free sex for everyone cuz the governor approves"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Rob.  My site doesn&#8217;t have porn, but it does have underage girls.  Twice, even, if you count the post about &#8220;free sex for everyone cuz the governor approves&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r3dw0rm</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-19</link>
		<author>r3dw0rm</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Did someone say school girls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone say school girls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol740</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-16</link>
		<author>Sol740</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>OH NOES !!! I am undone ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH NOES !!! I am undone &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-14</link>
		<author>brandie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>That's an interesting analogy.  Although, when I think about it, with a new car, as you said, you're extra careful to not spoil it and to take care of it.  It seems that when they airbrush these models and make them perfect, it seems to often appeal to a man's desire to fuck up something perfect.  They make them fragile so that the man wants to destroy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting analogy.  Although, when I think about it, with a new car, as you said, you&#8217;re extra careful to not spoil it and to take care of it.  It seems that when they airbrush these models and make them perfect, it seems to often appeal to a man&#8217;s desire to fuck up something perfect.  They make them fragile so that the man wants to destroy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol740</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-11</link>
		<author>Sol740</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Well I think that "beauty" in this case, is definetly equatable with fragility. If only because by airbrushing a photo, it makes the subject seem brand new, untouched, like a new car. Now that could be equated to a possesive personality, but I say that strictly in the same way as you would treat a new car. For instance, last time you bought a new vehicle, weren't you extra careful not to burn it with a cigarette, or drop a random piece of trash in it. To me an airbrushed photo has a porcelain quality to it, that may give that illusion as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think that &#8220;beauty&#8221; in this case, is definetly equatable with fragility. If only because by airbrushing a photo, it makes the subject seem brand new, untouched, like a new car. Now that could be equated to a possesive personality, but I say that strictly in the same way as you would treat a new car. For instance, last time you bought a new vehicle, weren&#8217;t you extra careful not to burn it with a cigarette, or drop a random piece of trash in it. To me an airbrushed photo has a porcelain quality to it, that may give that illusion as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-9</link>
		<author>brandie</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>The fact that beauty is equated with fragility makes me consider, however briefly, that maybe the feminists weren't all wrong.  Maybe the patriarchy wants women to be powerless, and thus sets the standard for beauty that way.  It also sheds some light on the fetish for school girls and traits that make women look as young as possible (like pigtails).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that beauty is equated with fragility makes me consider, however briefly, that maybe the feminists weren&#8217;t all wrong.  Maybe the patriarchy wants women to be powerless, and thus sets the standard for beauty that way.  It also sheds some light on the fetish for school girls and traits that make women look as young as possible (like pigtails).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol740</title>
		<link>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-6</link>
		<author>Sol740</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 04:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogomatique.com/2007/03/07/automatic-face-fixer/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I personally think that airbrushing is being way over-used. It kind of takes away the subjects personality. They all look so doll-like and inhuman. Fragile almost, like they could break if they move too quickly. Though hot, damn hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think that airbrushing is being way over-used. It kind of takes away the subjects personality. They all look so doll-like and inhuman. Fragile almost, like they could break if they move too quickly. Though hot, damn hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
